Snake charming

Mon 19 June 2000

Like the reptile it’s named after, Python squishes problems little by little.

Today I spent the whole afternoon with a snake. I’ve known Python for several years now — the oldest version of Python on my hard drive is v. 1.3, dated March 1996 — and I’ve studied and played with the language several times. But it wasn’t until today that I actually tried to do something useful with it.

The task at hand? I wanted to lay out the articles I’ve written during the last couple of months in an HTML format that is consistent with that of the rest of my Web site. My site is a modest one, and producing the few pages of HTML in it is fairly easy, even by hand. But doing the same formatting for a dozen or so articles (and the many more to come), even with a WISIWYG editor, is the kind of task that makes us lazy programmers start thinking about a better way: writing a program.

Figuring out that the formatting of the articles had to be automated was the easy part. Deciding on how to automate the process was more difficult. It’s not that I lacked a tool to do the job, but rather that I didn’t know the right tool to use. One of the mantras of programming is “When in doubt, start hacking,” so I did. After some experimenting with Perl, SED, and AWK, I remembered Python, a programming language often touted as capable of accomplishing everything easily. I hacked my way out of this problem with Python, and I wasn’t disappointed.

A breed apart

Python is an interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language that offers advanced features like modules, exception handling, and classes. Python’s syntax is simple, yet the native support for first-order functions (functions you can assign to variables or pass as parameters), lists, tuples, and maps (associative arrays) make it quite powerful. The compiler/interpreter and libraries are extensible, very portable, and open source. The language has been ported to the most diverse platforms, including several brands of Unix, Linux, MacOS, MS-DOS, Windows, and OS/2. Python libraries support everything from string handling to system calls to concurrency to Internet programming — including sockets, HTTP servers and clients, and HTML and XML parsing and formatting.

The greatest strength of Python is that it lets you think big, yet start small. Using Python, you can expand a four- line procedural or functional program into a full- blown web of concurrently interacting objects. Like the snake, Python can squish a problem, little by little.

Getting the snake out of the basket

The simplest automated scheme I could think of was to strip the original articles of everything but the basic HTML and embed them into a pre-formatted template, much like is done with server-side includes. I wrote the template and placed the tag right in the middle of it. I launched a browser with the Python HTML documentation, opened a console window, and started hacking.

To begin, I needed to open the template and target files. Python is an eclectic language; it borrows concepts from procedural, functional, and object-oriented programming languages. Whatever seems to work well, Python does. According to the Python documentation, to open a file I just needed to call the open function:

template = open("template.html")
target = open(article.html')

You don’t have to declare variables in Python and you can enclose strings in either single or double quotation marks.

Reading the files came next. Python provides an assortment of file reading functions, the simplest of which was precisely what I needed. In Python, the result from a call to open is an object of File type. Calling read on the object returns the complete contents of the file as a string:

template_text =

I finally opted for the more straightforward:

template = open("template.html").read()
target = open('article.html').read()

To embed the article in the template I needed a text substitution function, the simplest of which was to be found in the string module. As in many other languages, Python modules are used to hold related stuff together. Module string holds a set of useful string manipulation functions. The one I needed was the replace method. To use a module, you have to import it like this:

import string

After importing the module, I just had to call replace to do the substitution:

result = string.replace(template, "", target)

So far, the complete Python program I had written looked like this:

import string
template = open("template.html").read()
target = open(sys.argv[1]).read()
result = string.replace(template, "", target)
print result

I saved the program to a file, then made a couple of adjustments to make it more generic. For example, I made the program work on any file passed as a command-line parameter by using the functions available in the sys module. Here was the program after the changes:

import string
template = open("template.html").read()
target = open(sys.argv[1]).read()
result = string.replace(template, "", target)
print result

Now I could call the program up on any of my articles from the command line, like this:

python article.html > formatted_article.html

Try, try again

Alas, my initial attempt at automating the formatting of the articles wasn’t good enough. For starters, it didn’t cope with important HTML meta-information such as the tag, which should be included in every HTML file. Nor did it deal with the specific placement and formatting I wanted to give to the article’s abstract or the author’s name (mine). But Python was still up to the task. First I edited the articles and added the relevant meta-information on the very few lines of each file. Then I told Python to read the files as a list of lines instead of as a string, like this:

raw = open(filename).readlines()

Then I retrieved the information items by indexing the already read list:

title = raw[0]
author = raw[1]
text = string.join(raw[2:])

To convert the non-field article text from a list of lines back into a string, I used the string module’s join function, which does exactly what you’d expect. The expression raw[2:] retrieves the items from position 2 onward, as a new list.

I added a couple of special tags ( and ) as to the template to embed the new information at the right places. After adding the replacements for the new tags, the code looked like this:

import string
template = open("template.html").read()
target = open(sys.argv[1]).read()
result = string.replace(template, "", target)
result = string.replace(template, "", title)
result = string.replace(template, "", author)
print result

That was it for version 1.0: a seven-line program. The current version of the program (which you can download from my Web site) is 48 lines long and handles the article abstracts, parses the article’s date and formats it in two different ways, and manages the hyperlink to the article’s original publication URL. Had I been inclined to do so, I could have parsed the original HTML files to retrieve the chunks of information using Python’s XML and HTML parsing libraries. I could have also used the built-in dictionary (map) type to make the text substitutions more generic, and the regular expressions library to get really fancy. I didn’t, though, because my 48-line program already did what I needed. I’m fond of the KISS principle, especially in Extreme Programming. My philosophy: Do the simplest thing that could possibly work.

Originally written for In Publishing LLC
Copyright © 1999 Inprise Corp.

Other articles

Xtreme testing for Delphi programs

Sun 28 November 1999

A standard testing framework for Delphi has been long overdue. Now there is one and it’s even open source.

In my article on Xtreme testing, I talked about how it could improve the quality of programs as well as the speed and confidence with which they were developed. For ...

Continue reading …

The monopoly monster

Sun 21 November 1999

So Microsoft is a monopolistic monster. What are you going to do, gather the whole village to assault the castle with hoes and pitchforks? Burn it down with torches? Get real.

James Whales’ 1931 movie of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has become an icon of horror cinematography. Fulfilling his personal ...

Continue reading …

Java biking

Sun 14 November 1999

Launching a full-blown IDE for a brief Java programming excursion can be like driving the car to a nearby shopping mall. If you have ever imagined the equivalent of a Java bicycle, your fantasy may have come true with BeanShell v. 1.0.

I’d just moved to Davis, California ...

Continue reading …

Y2K: the beginning of the end?

Sun 07 November 1999

Will open source software development be smothered by the patents avalanche or help to end it?

As Developer News correspondent Constance Petersen discussed in her article last week, 5 Nov. was Burn All GIFs Day. The protest was organized by a group of open-source developers and Webmasters opposed to the ...

Continue reading …

Programmers or entrepreneurs?

Sun 31 October 1999

When royalties are out of the question, programmers find innovative ways of earning profits, such as providing value-added services. New ways of making business out of open source are being invented every day.

Amateurs!” That’s what critics call open-source programmers. And sometimes they really mean “hackers”: those who lack ...

Continue reading …

The lesson of Agincourt

Sun 24 October 1999

Open source programming underdogs may have more advantages than their critics imagine. But whether they win or lose in the end, it’s their story that inspires.

Giving away software is a “strategy of the weak.” At least most business analysts consider it so when comparing the strategy against the ...

Continue reading …

Xtreme testing

Sun 17 October 1999

Extreme programmers brave the open source slopes.

You can’t do it. You can’t add the feature. It’s too risky. You’d have to change a core part of the program, and who knows what kind of subtle bugs might creep in doing that! You got hold of ...

Continue reading …

Start the revolution without me

Sun 10 October 1999

Confused by the ruckus over open-source software? Bobby McFerrin had it right: Don’t worry, keep hacking.

Everybody’s talking about the “open software revolution.” From geek forums like SlashDot to academic journals like Communications of the ACM, from the New York Times to The Wall Street Journal, everyone is ...

Continue reading …

The true meaning behind open source licenses

Sun 03 October 1999

What does all this licensing stuff really mean?

I develop software for a living, so my position regarding third-party software has always been pragmatic: consider the cost and evaluate how well each solution meets your requirements. Most open source software is licensed free of charge. But does software that is ...

Continue reading …

A true story

Sun 26 September 1999

What “revolution”? A long-term open source enthusiast describes his conversion.

Source code has been available for decades, long before the so-called “open source revolution” started. I have found value in using and writing open source software since I first began experimenting with open source solutions to critical business problems. It ...

Continue reading …